• yam天空
  • 天空部落
  • 新聞
  • 登入 註冊 網誌隨便逛
  • 加入天空部落
  • 華文部落格大賞結果出爐!

網誌 相簿 影音 PK吧! Honda嬉遊趣
即時新聞 影音新聞 新聞專輯 政治新聞 財經新聞 娛樂新聞 運動新聞 兩岸新聞 科技新聞
管理介面 發表網誌 發表日記 上傳相片 上傳影音 管理留言
推薦這個部落格: 230

西雅圖凹凸鏡

廖桂賢的地景及社會觀察

網誌 |留言板
都市規劃設計的生態面向(四): 馬爾摩西港新市鎮的啟示 | 主頁 | 迎接一個嶄新的公共水岸空間:Olympic Sculpture Park
January 23, 2007
造成潛在洪災恐怖的水壩以文找文
kueihsienl 在天空部落發表於12:57:36 | 水患課題
鼓勵此網誌:0 

去年三月,夏威夷的一個約十二公尺高的水壩崩潰,造成如海嘯般的巨浪直衝下游聚落,帶來水災,造成的生命財產衝擊可想而知。是的,不會下雨,也會產生水災,世界各地數以千百萬計的水霸,不管大小型,都是危急人們生命財產的不定時炸彈。昨天紐約時報的一篇文章Before the Flood,探討美國的水壩帶來的潛在性危險,也很值得做為台灣的警惕。將文章轉貼在這裡供參考。

 
January 22, 2007

Op-Ed Contributor

Before the Flood

By JACQUES LESLIE

San Francisco

WHEN the 40-foot-high Kaloko dam collapsed on the Hawaiian island of Kauai last March, its reservoir released a 70-foot-high, 200-foot-wide, 1.6-million-ton wave that carried away 16 cars, hundreds of trees and a cluster of houses, drowning all seven occupants. At least two bodies were swept three-quarters of a mile to the ocean; four were never recovered.


It is tempting to dismiss Kaloko’s collapse as an isolated event, but given the perilous state of the nation’s dams, it is more likely a harbinger. In 2005, the American Society of Civil Engineers gave dams a D, a grade that is still justified two years later.

For starters, the nation’s dam stock is rapidly aging. Most dams need major repairs 25 to 50 years after they’re built, and most dams are at least 25 years old; some, like the 116-year-old Kaloko, were built more than a century ago.

As dams age, their danger increases. This is a matter of not just advancing decrepitude, but “hazard creep” — the tendency of developers to build directly downstream from dams, in the path of floods that would follow dam failures. The result is that even though Americans now build few dams, more and more dams threaten people’s lives. Chiefly for this reason, the number of dams identified in one estimate as capable of causing death and in need of rehabilitation more than doubled from 1999 to 2006, from around 500 to nearly 1,400. The civil engineers’ 2005 report placed the number of unsafe dams much higher, at more than 3,500.

On top of that, dam safety officials are so overworked that in most states, they don’t come close to carrying out all the inspections required by law. According to the engineers’ society, the average state dam inspector is responsible for 268 dams; in four states the number exceeds 1,200. It is no coincidence that even though Hawaiian law requires dam inspections every five years, Kaloko was never inspected.

We don’t even know how many dams the country possesses. Using one set of criteria, the National Inventory of Dams, maintained by the Army Corps of Engineers, places the number at 79,777, while the sum of dams inventoried by the states is more than 99,000. Even that number is questionable, since it includes suspiciously low counts from several states. In addition, state officials are constantly discovering previously uncounted dams during routine inspection trips. And if the definition of dams is broadened to include the smallest ones, the estimates are as high as several million.

Unlike, say, waterways and sanitation plants, a majority of dams — 56 percent of those inventoried — are privately owned, which is one reason dams are among the country’s most dangerous structures. Many private owners can’t afford to repair aging dams; some owners go so far as to resist paying by tying up official repair demands in court or campaigning to weaken state dam safety laws.

When the Kauai public works department ordered Kaloko’s owner to stop grading a hilltop next to the reservoir in 1997, the local mayor interceded, instructing the responsible county engineer not to interfere; an investigation by a Hawaiian deputy attorney general published on Jan. 8 found that the owner then covered the earthen dam’s emergency spillway with dirt, in the process weakening the dam’s defenses.

Thousands of dams have been abandoned by their owners, and over time, title to them has become obscure — 12 percent of the dams in the Army Corps of Engineers’ inventory have no known owner. As these dams become dilapidated, the states are left with the expensive task of repairing or dismantling them. Privatization advocates, take heed: this is a cautionary tale.

Climate change will also make dams more dangerous by increasing precipitation in many parts of the country, thus undermining the flood assumptions that underlie dam designs. Consider that in October 2005 and last May, two strong but hardly cataclysmic New England rain storms caused the overtopping or breaching of more than 400 dams in three states; a much fiercer storm would compromise far more dams, worsening flooding and potentially endangering thousands of people.

Dams are ranked according to the danger they pose — “high hazard” dams threaten human life if they fail; “significant hazard” dams threaten property; and “low hazard” dams threaten neither. But many dams are inaccurately ranked — the Kaloko dam, for instance, was rated low hazard.

In addition, in most states the rankings do not take into account the potential impact of toxic chemicals from factories, agricultural runoff and mines that gather in sediment behind dams, even though their sudden release can poison humans, wildlife and vegetation far downstream. When a coal tailings dam near Inez, Ky., failed in October 2000, 250 million gallons of coal sludge were sent into the Big Sandy River and its tributaries, killing aquatic life in the streams.

More sobering still, about half the dams in the Corps’ inventory, including many high-hazard ones, do not have emergency plans in case of failure. When these plans are properly executed — by identifying structures likely to be inundated and keeping up-to-date records of residents’ phone numbers — they save lives. But the plans that do exist are often inaccurate, and many of the people they’re intended to protect have no idea of the potential peril they face. California is the only state that even requires property buyers to be informed of potential jeopardy from an upstream dam.

The American Society of Civil Engineers estimated in 2005 that repairing dams threatening human life would cost $10.1 billion, while a 2003 study by the Association of Dam Safety Officials placed the cost of repairing all non-federally owned dams in the national inventory at $36.2 billion. In the last session Congress considered legislation to repair dams at a rate of $25 million a year for five years, but even that feeble gesture didn’t make it out of committee.

Americans are easily persuaded to spend hundred of billions of dollars combating debatable terrorist threats from outside the , while failing to notice that inside the country, the infrastructure is crumbling. True, outside forces from time to time topple established regimes, but usually not before their insides have started to rot.

Jacques Leslie is the author of “Deep Water: The Epic Struggle Over Dams, Displaced People and the Environment.”

原文網址:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/opinion/22leslie.2.html


留言 (0) | 引用 (0) | 人氣 () | 轉寄
此分類上一篇:淹水土石流該怪誰? | 主頁 | 此分類下一篇:[農訓雜誌轉載] 治水新觀念 還地給河流 / 林淑英VS. 廖桂賢 & 溫炳原
引用 (你可以針對此文寫一篇屬於自己的blog/想法,並給作者一個通告)
引用
留言 (0筆)
發表你的留言 (字數限制 最多 2000 個中文字)
私密留言: 是 否
Name:





是 否
內容:
系統公告
桂賢的新書,請多多指教!
好城市
聲援農村 | 反對毀滅環境的開發案
反中科熱血青年聯盟
搶救徐州路老樹
連署搶救老樹
個人檔案
個人圖檔
ID:kueihsienl
暱稱:廖桂賢
地區:北美洲
  • 訂閱 |
    • 我要訂閱此部落格的
    • 日記
    • 網誌
    • 相簿
  • 好友 |
    • 好友功能
    • 觀看好友列表
    • 觀看人緣列表
  • 人氣 |
  • 簡介 

人氣指數
當日人次:
累積人次:
文章分類
  • 目錄 (13)
  • 凹凸鏡佈告欄 (21)
  • 空間設計與城鄉規劃 (88)
  • 環境生態 (41)
  • 永續家園行動 (52)
  • 西雅圖的故事 (49)
  • 社會文化觀察 (65)
  • 異國旅人手札 (65)
  • 美加探索札記 (20)
  • 水患課題 (20)
  • 美濃 (6)
  • 求學工作與生活雜記 (36)
  • 從世界看台灣 (5)
  • 私房推薦 (32)
kueihsienl的最新的回應
  • Уенхан Шие:
    我都拿好城市來送人,把...
  • 李國彰:
    恭喜好友喜獲殊榮!一本...
  • par:
    這跟我以前住的德州沒啥...
  • 小倩:
    阿桂老師~~好懷念美國...
  • katarina25:
    私密留言
讀者從哪裡來?
Locations of visitors to this page
黑米
非常用心的好站

全國環境行事曆

[連結] 台灣的民間力量
  • 公共電視「我們的島」
  • 環境資訊中心
  • 台灣綠黨
  • 台灣環境行動網
  • 美濃愛鄉協進會
  • 搶救福隆沙灘
  • 南方電子報
  • 台灣綠色公民行動聯盟
  • 淡水河守護聯盟
  • 治水監督聯盟
  • 我的一畝田
  • 小地方新聞網
  • 苦勞網
  • 美濃農村田野學會
  • 野上野下
  • 台灣農村陣線
  • 公民行動影音紀錄資料庫
  • 為地球嗆聲
  • 莫拉克獨立新聞網
[連結] 國外的民間力量
  • People's Waterfront Coalition
  • Center for Law in the Public Interest
[連結] 永續課題
  • Environment for Europeans
  • Word Changing
  • Fragile Earth
  • People and Place: Ideas that Connect Us
  • Resilience Science
  • Open the Future
[連結] 永續設計
  • Low Impact Development Center
  • Ecocity Builders
  • US Green Building Council
  • Green Infrastructure
  • SOLTAG energy housing
  • Better Bricks
[連結] 水患管理
  • Polders - The Scene of Land and Water
  • EU Flood Risk Management
[連結] 地景 / 建築
  • European Prize for Uban Public Space
  • European Archive of Urban Public Space
[連結] 規劃設計組織
  • The Buckminster Fuller Institute
  • Participatory Community Design in the Pacific Rim
  • National Association for Olmsted Parks
  • Holcim Foundation for Sustainable Construction
  • The Cultural Landscape Foundation
  • Urban Land Institute
[連結] 規劃設計雜誌
  • Harvard Design Magazine
  • TOPOS
  • Inhabitat
  • Tree Hugger
  • Land+Living
  • Daylight & Architecture magazine by VELUX
[連結] 電影 / 紀錄片
  • An Inconvenient Truth
  • Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room
  • Oil on Ice
  • Fear and Trembling
  • The March of the Penguins
  • Supersize me
  • Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price
  • The Corporation
  • Grizzly Man
  • Emmanuel's Gift
  • Next Industrial Revolution
  • Ecological Design: Inventing the Future
  • 榖子‧榖子
  • 南方澳海洋紀事
  • Who Killed the Electric Car
  • Street Fight
  • 練習曲 Island Etude
  • Drowned Out 滅頂家園
  • Darwin's Nightmare
  • 河口人
  • The 11th Hour
  • Guns, Germs & Steel
  • Planet Earth
  • When the Levees Broke
  • What would Jesus Buy?
  • The Kite Runner
  • Sicko
  • Arctic Tale
  • Oil + Water
  • RiverWebs
  • River Ways
  • The Carbon Connection
  • Fast Food Nation
  • T-Shirt Travels
  • Up the YangTze
  • FLOW
  • Darbareye Elly
  • Food, Inc.
  • 囧男孩
  • 平成狸合戦
  • Home
  • Capitalism: A Love Story
  • Everything's Cool
  • 我家門前有大河
  • Amal
  • The Yes Men Fix the World
  • Poisoned Waters
[連結] 綠色生活
  • The Green Guide
  • Green Roofs for Healthy Cities
  • 主婦聯盟生活消費合作社
  • EarthSave
  • Seattle EcoMetro
[連結] 親友的部落格
  • 鐵蛋魚酥雜貨舖
  • 瑞典小丸子
  • 江彥生的學術網站
  • 爬天梯
  • 游離在海洋與城市之間
  • 蔚藍手札
  • 北歐四季透明筆記
  • 美濃菸酒會
  • 台灣雜燴: Tawain COMBO
  • Jellyfishing State
  • 老得太快,聰明得太遲
  • et dansk eventyr…
  • Clio & Sonya 的異想世界
  • 邱銘源的自然野簿
  • 林祖媽哇欸天空
  • 印地安娜旅外生活
  • 環境的自辯
  • Explore Drawing & Painting
  • 誰來趕走雨季?
  • We've Been There
  • Koufei 從迦納到台灣
  • 山居年歲冠冕
誰推薦我
我的讀書筆記
  • 生態城市‧都市水文
誰來我家
拿來增加效果的東西
搜尋此頻道內容
搜尋:
RSS 訂閱
RSS2
ATOM
贊助商
其它資訊
本部落所刊登之內容,皆由作者個人所提供,不代表 yam 天空 本身立場。
POWERED BY
POWERED BY 天空部落
會員登入│免費註冊