系統公告
個人檔案
個人圖檔
ＩＤ：skyutopia
暱稱：Neosho
地區：臺南市

文章分類
skyutopia的最新的回應
好時光貼曆
人氣指數
當日人次:
累積人次:
我推薦誰
誰推薦我
誰來我家
RSS 訂閱
RSS2
ATOM
贊助商
其它資訊
本部落所刊登之內容，皆由作者個人所提供，不代表 yam天空部落 本身立場。
POWERED BY
POWERED BY
會員登入│免費註冊
Great Music in My Central Message | 主頁 | 事件之弦 ( EVENT STRINGS )
August 12, 2006
Q&A : Ancient Arrow Project Novel以文找文

http://www.wingmakers.com/creator.html
因為原文網站曾經經過更新，有些問題的編號已改變，
這裡是採用Creator Q & A Sessions by Topical Arrangement (Adobe PDF 1.28 MB)
所提供的編排。

 

翻譯 by psiage

Q&A : Ancient Arrow Project Novel

Question 12-S1: Is the mystery girl (Lea) that Neruda must find, a real person? Has she been found? (Is her mother "Sarah", Sarah De Rosney?) If she is real and hasn't been found, are you hoping her to turn up in this forum? What is her purpose?

Answer: In the story of the Ancient Arrow Project, characters are fictional. In the story yet to be released Lea plays a key role. Her character is an architect of the interdimensional Tributary Zones, and she is incarnate to activate them. Collectively the seven physical sites play a role in the discovery of the Grand Portal.

問題12-S1 : (小說中)Neruda必須找到的神秘女孩(Lea)是真有其人嗎？她被找到了嗎？(她小說中的媽媽Sarah，就是那個Sarah嗎？)如果真有其人而 她還沒有被找到，你會希望她在這個討論區(譯註：WingMakers網站的討論區)裡出現嗎？找到她的目的是什麼？

回答：在“古箭計劃”的故事中，角色都是虛構的。在尚未發表的故事裡Lea扮演著關鍵性的角色。她的角色是許多“多重次元支流地帶”的設計者，而她具體化 (incarnate)以來啟動它們。集體性地，這七個物質性的選址(the seven physical sites)共同參與了“偉大入口”的發現。

 


Question 1-S2 – Am I correct in believing that the events and technologies as depicted in the Ancient Arrow story are correct, whilst the names, places, organisations, photo’s and artifacts are fictitious/mythological? I assume that the factual aspects of the story were obtained by yourself through a form of RV?

Answer: You are correct on both accounts.

問題 1-S2 – 我相信在“古箭故事”裡描述的事件和科技是正確的，而人名、地點、組織、照片和人工製品則是虛構的/神話式的。我認為故事的事實依據是你本人透過一種“遙視”的方式而獲得的。我正確嗎？

回答：你在兩個項目上都是正確的。


Question 18-S2 – Interview 4 with Dr. Neruda mentions technologies from real US and Russian corporations. The technologies originate from ACIO research. I have checked this out, and the info on the Mig29 and the Internet compression technologies stand up to scrutiny. Is there a risk of legal action against yourself, Mark and the South Bay Group for making these allegations?

Answer: Yes, but it is an acceptable risk.

問題 18-S2 – Neruda的第四篇訪問裡提到真的是美國和蘇聯合作而來的科技，這科技源自ACIO的研究。我去查過了，而米格29和網際網路壓縮技術的消息對詳細的檢 查站得住腳。做這樣的申述，你們是不是冒了會有法律行動來對付你本人、Mark和South Bay Group公司的風險？

回答：是的，但那是一個值得接受的風險。


Question 43-S3 – Why has the storyline changed from Dr. Anderson to Dr. Neruda and why the time changes in the story line?

Answer: The story was modified to track misappropriations of the Ancient Arrow story within the marketplace. There are more subtle changes than the ones you mentioned in your question. None of the primary (encoded) content has been altered since it was first published.

問題 43-S3 – 為什麼故事情節（裡主角的名字）由Anderson博士變成了Neruda博士，為什麼在故事情節裡的時間也改變了？（譯註：WingMakers網站成 立於1998年，但在2001年3月份的時候，網站的內容有很重大的修改－－主要是一些人名、地名、時間、以及本來的〝原始創造者〞（Prime Creator）改為〝最初源頭〞（First Source）。）

回答：故事被修改是為了因應在市場上對於〝古箭〞故事的濫用。有許多微妙的改變比你在問題裡所提到的還要多。但是自從它發行以來，沒有任何主要的（被編碼的）內容有被修改過。


Question 44-S3 – Why did the Wingmakers allow the ACIO to discover the AA site, if the ACIO was going to keep the public out?

Answer: The ACIO was the only earth-based organization that could decode the content. Because Dr. Neruda worked at the ACIO and was known to be the key architect of the discovery’s public release, it was essential that the discovery occur at the ACIO.

問題 44-S3 – 如果ACIO不會把資訊公開的話，那為什麼WingMakers要讓ACIO來發現〝古箭遺址〞呢？

回答：ACIO是地球上唯一一個能夠解譯這些內容的組織。因為Neruda博士在ACIO工作，而且他被認為是把這個發現釋出給大眾的關鍵參與者（architect），所以這項發現發生在ACIO是必要的。


Question 45-S3 – Why did the WingMakers not use their time travel abilities to insure that the planting of the Map artifact did not result in loss of the students’ lives, therefore effectively nullifying any chance of this event having a 'dark cloud' over it's happening, and subsequent WingMakers Information. Would you consider changing the story line and erasing the needless deaths of the students who found the artifact?

Answer: Every discovery of import has a “dark cloud” over it. It is intrinsic to the drama of life that important discoveries are dimensional and mesoteric – that is, they include the exoteric and esoteric life rules, which number among them the sacrifice of human life. The students represent the metaphor of the innocent discoverers that must be sacrificed in order to underscore the importance of their discovery.

問題 45-S3 – 為什麼WingMakers不運用他們時間旅行的能力來確保那個繪有地圖的人工製品之設置不要導致那些學生的生命之喪失，而因此有效地去除會給這個事件的 發生和隨後的WingMakers資訊帶來‘烏雲’的任何機會呢？你會考慮改變故事的情節而除去發現人工製品的那些學生之不必要的死亡嗎？（譯註：在小說 裡，最早發現那個人工製品的兩個大學生後來被滅口了。）

回答：每一個重要的發現都會有一點‘烏雲’在它上面。對於‘重要的發現都是重大（dimensional）與mesoteric的’之生命戲劇來說，這是 固有的。此即，它們包含了能被理解的與不能被理解的生命法則，人類生命的犧牲也被計入在這些法則裡面。那些學生代表了‘為了要強調他們的發現之重要性，而 必須被犧牲掉的無辜的發現者’之隱喻。


Question 54A-S3 – Did the Wingmakers leave material at all of the Seven Tributary sites at the same time to be found in sequence? Or did they leave it over a period of time?

Answer: The WingMakers sites – each of the seven – will be translated in a specific order. Remember that each site carries a central theme that is connected to the seven disciplines of Lyricus. These seven disciplines – collectively – are the triggers for those incarnating in approximately 35-40 years who will be the scientists, scholars, psychologists, and artists that will uncover and disseminate the Grand Portal.

此問題的中譯，我找不到。
此分類上一篇:Great Music in My Central Message | 主頁 | 此分類下一篇:事件之弦 ( EVENT STRINGS )
引用 (你可以針對此文寫一篇屬於自己的blog/想法,並給作者一個通告)
引用
留言 (0筆)
發表你的留言 (字數限制 最多 2000 個中文字)
私密留言: 是 否
Name:





是 否
內容: